Sunday, 25 January 2015

Beam me up Scotty: German scientists invent working teleported, of sorts

Title: Beam me up Scotty: German scientists invent working teleported, of sorts

Summary:
This article is about how scientists from Hasso Plattner Institute in Potsdam have invented a real-life teleporter system that can scan in an object and “beam it” to another location. The process relies on destructive scanning and 3D printing. The system entails an object at one end of the system is milled down layer-by-layer, creating a scan per layer which is then transmitted through an encrypted communication to a 3D printer. The printer then replicates the original object layer by layer, effectively teleporting an object from one place to another.

Facts/Phrases:
Ø  Teleportation has been the holy grail of transport for decades, ever since Mr Scott first beamed up Captain Kirk and his crew in the 1966 opening episode of Star Trek. Now the technology may have been cracked in real life … sort of.

Opinion:
In my opinion, this is reminiscent and nostalgic of all the cartoon shows that we use to watch as children where people were transported from one place to another, granted that this is slightly different as it only transports inanimate objects it’s at least one step closer to that of what we recall from childhood.  


WhatsApp messenger makes move to the web

Title: WhatsApp messenger makes move to the web


Summary:
This article is about the how whatsapp messenger, which is a major communication application that is now entering the web-iverse, as they have a new web-based app that finally, allows users to send messages from a computer to contacts using smartphones. It also allows them to reply all chats.

Facts/Phrases:
Ø  The new platform allows WhatsApp’s 700m users to send and receive free text, picture and voice messages through Google Chrome on a computer, but only if they use WhatsApp on an Android, Windows Phone or BlackBerry. IPhone users need not apply.
Ø  The Facebook-owned service recently announced that it had 700m monthly active users who send more than 30bn WhatsApp messages a day. It has added about 25m users a month since August 2014.
Ø  WhatsApp’s main rivals include Facebook’s own Messenger app, which reached 500m active users in November and can be used through a web browser without a connection to the smartphone, along with Chinese messaging app WeChat, which reached 438m active users in August.

Opinion:

In my opinion, this is a prime example of the rapid growth of New and digital media has revolutionised communication, as originally it was 2 cans and thread of string, but messaging has grown from phone to phone to phone to computer. The fact that whatsapp has entered websites platform presents how there is major competition and the race to survive the hardship of staying on top. There is a necessity of staying on top.   

Thursday, 22 January 2015

Identities and the Media: Reading the Riots

  1. How did the language and selection of images in the coverage create a particular representation of young people? 
The language and selection of images had created a negative representation of the youth and teenagers in particular due to the incorporated Mise-en-scene being a recall to that of action films and unlined reality which may have over exaggerated the riots to create an even more inaccurate representation of young people.

  1. Why does David Buckingham mention Owen Jones and his work Chavs: the demonization of the working class?
David Buckingham mentions Owen Jones due to the fact Owen Jones states that there is a new modernised Britain and that the working class has slowly become an object if fear and ridicule within the media.

  1. What is the typical representation of young people – and teenage boys in particular? What did the 2005 IPSOS/MORI survey find?
The survey discovered that 40% of articles that included/mentioned young people primarily focused on violence and not their positive achievements. Also, 71% of the overall articles presented them in a negative manner.

  1. How can Stanley Cohen’s work on Moral Panic be linked to the coverage of the riots?
The theory of moral panic can be applied as the coverage of the riots constructed an overall consensus of fear and panic for young people whist it was occurring which undoubtedly has stayed with many individuals. 

  1. What elements of the media and popular culture were blamed for the riots?
The blamed elements were Rap music, violent video games and reality TV for their ‘undisciplined’ nature.

  1. How was social media blamed for the riots? What was interesting about the discussion of social media when compared to the Arab Spring in 2011?
Social media as it helped organise, advertise and spread the riots as its primary users are to a similar demographic of the ones involved in the riots. This is in contrast to the Arab springs in which social media was championed as being a new democratic format for oppressed individuals to voice their opinions on.

  1. The riots generated a huge amount of comment and opinion - both in mainstream and social media. How can the two-step flow theory be linked to the coverage of the riots? 
The two step-floe theory can be linked as 'twitter famous' individuals became opinion leaders on which many of their follower relied on their opinion to help construct their own.

  1. Alternatively, how might media scholars like Henry Jenkins view the 'tsunami' of blogs, forums and social media comments? Do you agree that this shows the democratisation of the media?
I believe that this does show democratisation as individuals who may or may not be oppressed can express their opinions and have freedom of speech without fear of backlash due to new and digital media being anonymous.

  1. What were the right-wing responses to the causes of the riots?
The right wing response was negative as they were compared to beasts and dogs that could not be controlled and needed to be put on 'leashes'.

  1. What were the left-wing responses to the causes of the riots?
The left wing blamed society and the inequality present in it and the continuous negative reprobation that has existed for a number of years and also cuts youth centres etc.

  1. What are your OWN views on the main causes of the riots?
I believe the riots took place due to a combination of two things. First of all, a there was a bias representation of the youth in the media. Secondly, the cut of funds that kept teenagers busy in long uneventful periods leading to the quick spread and adoption around the country as a form of entertainment. 

  1. How can capitalism be blamed for the riots? What media theory (from our new/digital media unit) can this be linked to?
Capitalism can be blamed as we now live in a materialistic society and many individuals believe their worth is characterised by their possessions. Therefore, when there was an opportunity to obtain a large number of desired goods, many acknowledged this and decided to exploit it.

  1. Were people involved in the riots given a voice in the media to explain their participation?
People involved in the riots were not provided an opportunity to voice their opinion as it may have gone against the representation many institutions have created for them. Also, it may have challenged hegemonic views designed by the controlling class to achieve events such as the riots to keep parts of society 'in their place' and ensure other classes had the same injected view of them.

  1. What is your own opinion on the riots? Do you have sympathy with those involved or do you believe strong prison sentences are the right approach to prevent such events happening in future?

In my opinion the riots were a culmination of several factors that had led to a large blow to the UK and became memorable. I do have sympathy for a small minority of the victims as they may have legitimately troubled and have viable reasons to rot. 

Sunday, 18 January 2015

US and UK plan cyber ‘war games’ to test resilience

Title: US and UK plan cyber ‘war games’ to test resilience


Summary:
This artivle is about a rolling programme of transatlantic cyber “war games” are to be conducted by British and US intelligence agencies to test their resilience in the face of mounting global cyber-attacks. Obama and Cameron have been finalizing plans to take the first step to simulate attacks on the banks of London city and Wall Street.

Facts/Phrases:
Ø  Agents from GCHQ and MI5 on the UK side and from the National Security Agency and the FBI on the US side are already working in the US division of the cell. This will be matched by a cyber-cell in the UK.
Ø  In a speech on Tuesday at the National Cyber security Communications Integration Centre, the president spoke of the need for a “shared mission” involving the government and the private sector. Warning that most of the US’s “critical infrastructure” is owned by the private sector and run on networks connected to the net, the president said: “Neither the government nor the private sector can defend the nation alone. It is going to have to be a shared mission.”

Opinion:

In my opinion, this is quite intriguing in terms that they are insane enough to attack the banks/wall street when if they do the systems will be vulnerable and when they do carry this out the likelihood that any hackers won’t be just waiting to hack and attack the systems to make millions just disappear.

Elon Musk donates $10m to keep artificial intelligence good for humanity

Title: Elon Musk donates $10m to keep artificial intelligence good for humanity


Summary:
Billionaire entrepreneur and space travel-fan, Elon Musk says his money should be used to address concerns over safety. Musk has donated $10m to an AI research institute earmarked for a global research programme aimed at keeping AI beneficial to humanity.

Facts/Phrases:
Ø  The money will be used to support the goals laid out by the more than 100 AI researchers in early January, when they signed an open letter put out by the Future of Life Institute (FLI) calling on scientists to avoid AI “pitfalls”.
Ø  The FLI warns that self-driving cars need better ethical underpinnings before they can hit the streets, and that the economic case for replacing large sections of the workforce with robots ought to be subject to more scrutiny.

Opinion:
In my opinion, this is an intriguing topic as artificial intelligence is still a new industry despite its recent emergence. Artificial intelligence brings a whole new ball game to the table, and with it there is a dramatic benefit to risk ratio. Personally I am intrigued and concerned; watching films about robots tends to change the ones perspective to the AI killing humanity.


Google Glass can return – but it must clear four big hurdles first

Title: Google Glass can return – but it must clear four big hurdles first


Summary:
This article is about the recent halt to the Google glass project and a question on its future, a possible return as a fully fledged product. The article then goes on to explain the 4 hurdles that are preventing the return of the product. Google didn’t see the insult “Glasshole” coming, according to the Wall Street Journal. “The word Glasshole was a surprise to me. None of us had thought about that,” a former Google X executive told the paper. The Google glasses do not look appealing at all. The number one complaint is that the glasses just don’t last long enough. The need for a slim profile means that the battery pack is necessarily tiny, and there’s no easy way to make the device last longer without making that pack bigger.

Facts/Phrases:
Ø  It all points to Google’s desire to make Glass a genuine consumer-focused gadget, rather than the niche-interest product which appealed to the “explorers” who were prepared to pay £999 to be fancy beta-testers.

Opinion:

In my opinion, the slightest inkling of returning Google glass would be a big and horrific mistake, it’s a product unwanted, and lost cause, there is no real point using a product that has no real worth or use. Being devil’s advocate the idea is simple and complex at once, and is incredible on paper, in some sense a vision of the future, BUT it isn’t worth the hassle, no one in their senses would pay a grand to wear glasses that run out of power fast. Also, i would not want to be called a bloody Glasshole.

Amazon EU Sarl paid too little tax, EU competition regulator says

Title: Amazon EU Sarl paid too little tax, EU competition regulator says


Summary:
Amazon’s main European trading company that accounts for a fifth of the online retailers’ worldwide sales has been paying too little tax for years. This article goes on to explain Amazon’s troubled past with tax and how they have been struggling to sort it out.

Facts/Phrases:
Ø  Amazon EU Sarl, the group’s Luxembourg trading hub sales of €13.6bn (£10.3bn) in 2013, had been paying inflated royalty fees to another Amazon entity.
Ø  AEHT made profits of €1.93bn in the seven years from 2007 to 2013 after receiving €3.31bn from other Amazon companies, according to a Guardian analysis of its accounts. At the end of that period Amazon EU Sarl still owed AEHT €2.1bn.
Ø  Among the most controversial aspects of Amazon’s 2003 tax ruling, the commission’s decision paper suggested was an effective cap on the amount that could be earned by Amazon EU Sarl, being 0.55% of turnover. The commission claimed this provided an “effective override”, replacing a more conventional basis on which to calculate the proper value of royalties.

Opinion:

In my opinion, this article is about how new and digital media has become so advance it’s assisted in tax evasion in some sense.